Wow! This is a huge contribution! Thank you @shainegordon! ❤️

Ill approve the workflow and have our CI do an initial runthrough. Once the CI is satisfied I will pass this along for a proper review and we can then look to merge it!

Unfortunately I will only be able to look at this after the 12th August, as

Not a problem at all! Ping me once your back and I can relook at it!

I swear that I looked for a test folder, and didn’t see any, obviously I

We use the playground as our test environment. Both playgrounds are started and it checks if any issues occur! But in your PR its only a simple linting issue!

@zoey-kaiser I have gone ahead and fixed the linting issues.

I've also added a GitHub Action job "test-playground-cookie" to align with the others

@zoey-kaiser I have gone ahead and fixed the linting issues.

Perfect! I am letting the CI run once again and if everything goes well, I will do some testing! We also need some documentation to the new provider, do you feel comfortable adding it in /docs?

@zoey-kaiser I have gone ahead and fixed the linting issues.

Perfect! I am letting the CI run once again and if everything goes well, I will do some testing! We also need some documentation to the new provider, do you feel comfortable adding it in /docs?

Sure, I will see if I can update the docs sometime this week.

I just got back from leave, so have a bit of catching up to do for the day job 😄

any updates?

EAGERLY awaiting this to be merged

Hi everyone!

I want to merge this and begin testing it as soon as we release 0.6.0! I don't want to cram this into that release, as we have already done a lot of testing on it and introducing this, may break some things.
I hope we can release 0.6.0 next week and then I can do a new beta release with this provider!

Hang tight. I have not forgotten about you ♥️

Hi all, i added options to local provider to prevent adding many provider workflows. you can see all here.
IMHO, it's better to add simple options to the config file.
#564

Closed in favour of #564